Effect of Permeation Enhancers on the Release and Permeation Kinetics of Propranolol Hydrochloride Gels through Mouse Skin

V Sai Kishore * and TE Gopala Krishna Murthy

Bapatla College of Pharmacy , Bapatla-522101

*Corresponding Author E-mail:  voiceofsaikishore@yahoo.com

 

ABSTRACT

In the present study efforts were made to prepare transdermal gels of Propranolol Hydrochloride using polymers like HPMC, NaCMC, M.C ,Carbopol, PEG6000 and PVP. The gel formulations can be graded in the following order with respect to the rates of release of drug from them: (HPMC) < (MC) < (Carbopol) <(NaCMC) < (NaCMC +PVP)< (NaCMC+ PEG 6000). Various permeation enhancers, namely, SLS,( 2% w/w) , 2% w/v  of  PEG400, DMSO and Tween 20 were incorporated into gels with a view to improve permeability of drug. The correlation coefficient values (r) revealed that the diffusion profiles follows zero order kinetics and the mechanism of drug release was governed by peppas model. The diffusion exponent of release profiles (slope) has a value of (n>1), which indicates case II transport diffusion. Formulation-GP1 (NaCMC +PEG 6000+ Tween 20) shown required release rate in comparison with other formulations and  was selected as suitable candidate to be delivered through transdermal route at controlled rate.

 

KEY WORDS:     Propranolol Hydrochloride, Gels, Polymers, Permeation enhancers,

 


INTRODUCTION:


Proponolol Hydrochloride (PHCL) is a non selective β-adrenergic blocking agent. It has been widely used in the trea tment of hypertension and many other cardiovascular disorders. PHCL is subjected to an extensive and highly variable hepatic first pass metabolism following oral administration, with reported systemic bioavailability of between 15 and 23%.1 As its biological half life is about 3.9 h and is eliminated rapidly, repeated daily administrations are needed to maintain effective plasma levels that makes it suitable candidate to be delivered through transdermal route at controlled rate. Administration of drugs through transdermal route bypasses the first pass metabolism and there by   increases the bioavailability. The development of technology for release of drug at controlled rate into systemic circulation using skin as a port of entry has become popular for various reasons2 .The transdermal entry of drug in to systemic circulation at a desired   rate can be achieved by using a suitable rate controlling membrane and a drug reservoir.3 Earlier studies proved that cellulose acetate films could be used as rate controlling membranes for the design of TDD systems.4 With a view to design a suitable drug reservoir, various types of gel formulations were prepared.

 

The gels are becoming more popular due to ease of application and better percutaneous absorption, than other semisolids preparations. Gels can resist the physiological stress caused by skin flexion, blinking and mucociliary movement, adopting the shape of the applied area, and controlling drug release. 5

 

To enhance the permeability of PHCL, various permeation enhancers were incorporated into the gels. The in-vitro skin permeation experiments are known for their value in studying the rate and mechanism of percutaneous absorption of drugs. To study the effect of permeation enhancers on the release and permeation kinetics of PHCL gels, those are evaluated by studying drug diffusion through cellulose acetate membrane and mouse skin.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

PHCL was obtained as a gift sample from Natco Pharma, Hyderabad. Cellulose acetate (viscosity of 6% solution in 95% acetone-water mixture  at 200 C having 140 CS viscosity, G.S. Chemical Testing Lab and Allied Industries) , Ethyl acetate (Qualigens), Dibutyl phthalate (Ranbaxy Laboratories), Sodium CMC(200-300cPs, S. D. fine-chem Ltd.; Mumbai), Carbopol 934(Arihanth traders; Mumbai) Hydroxy Propyl Methyl cellulose(50cPs S. D. fine-chem Ltd.; Mumbai) and were Methyl cellulose (28-32%, S. D. fine-chem Ltd.; Mumbai) obtained commercially. All materials were used as received.


Table 1: Composition of Transdermal Gels Containing Various Polymers

INGREDIENTS

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

G6

Propranolol HCL (mg)

325

325

325

325

325

325

SodiumCMC(200-300cPs) (mg)

950

 

 

 

 

 

Carbopol 934 (mg)

 

1400

 

 

 

 

Methyl cellulose (28-32%) (mg)

 

 

750

 

 

 

HPMC (50cPs) (mg)

 

 

 

1750

 

 

Sodium CMC: PVP (2.4cP) (1:1) (mg)

 

 

 

 

950

 

Sodium CMC: PEG6000 (1:1)(mg)

 

 

 

 

 

950

Glycerin (ml)

2

2

2

2

2

2

Distilled water (ml) up to

20

20

20

20

20

20


Estimation of desired release rate:

The mathematical description of drug release that follow zero order kinetics is based on the equation.6,Where,K0r is zero order rate constant for drug release, Ke is first order rate constant for overall drug elimination, Cd is desired drug level in the body and Vd is volume space in which drug is distributed. For propranolol hydrochloride7 t˝ = 3.9 h,  Vd = 4.3 l and C=  0.02 µg/ml and therefore the desired drug release rate can be calculated as K0 r = (0.693/3.9)×0.02 ×4.3 ×70 =1.064 mg/h

 

Preparation of Drug Free Films:

Solvent evaporation technique was employed in the present work for the preparation of Cellulose acetate films. The polymer solutions were prepared by dissolving the polymer (2% w/w Cellulose acetate) in 50 ml of Ethyl acetate-Methanol (8:2). Dibutyl phthalate at a concentration of 40% w/w of the polymer was used as a plasticizer. 20 ml of the polymer solution was poured in a Petri plate (9.4 cm diameter) placed on a horizontal flat surface. The rate of evaporation was controlled by inverting a funnel over the Petri plate. After 24 hours the dried films were taken out and stored in a desiccator.

 

Table 2: Composition of Transdermal Gels Containing Various Permeation Enhancers

INGREDIENTS

GP1

GP2

GP3

GP4

Propranolol HCL (mg)

325

325

325

325

Sodium CMC: PEG6000 (mg) (1:1)

950

950

950

950

Tween 20(ml)

0.361

 

 

 

SLS (mg)             

 

400

 

 

DMSO (ml)

 

 

0.363

 

PEG 400(ml)

 

 

 

0.357

Glycerin (ml)

2

2

2

2

Distilled water (ml) up to

20

20

20

20

 

Formulation of Drug Reservoir gels:

Different drug reservoir gels were formulated as per the composition given in Table 1.  The required quantities of polymer Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose(Na CMC)(or) Methyl cellulose (MC)(or) Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), was weighed and transferred separately into a mortar. It was triturated with 10 ml of water. Specified amount of Propranolol Hydrochloride was weighed accurately and dissolved in glycerin. The resulting drug solution was incorporated into the polymer

 

 

dispersion slowly with continuous trituration to obtain a gel. The gel was transferred in to a measuring cylinder and the volume was made up to 20 ml with distilled water. As shown in the Table1, specified amount of carbapol 940 was soaked in 15 ml of water over night. Specified amount of propranolol hydrochloride was weighed accurately and dissolved in glycerin. The resulting drug solution was incorporated into the polymer dispersion with stirring at 500 rpm ,by a magnetic stirrer for 1 h. Tri ethanolamine (0.5%)  was added to brought the pH  neutral and the volume was made up to 20 ml with distilled water. Two different hydrophilic polymers viz., Poly vinyl pyrolidine (PVP) and Poly ethylene glycol -6000(PEG-6000) were incorporated in 1:1 ratio (NaCMC: Polymer) into NaCMC gels in formulation G5 and formulation G6 respectively. The resulting gels were filled in collapsible tubes.

 

Preparation of Gels containing permeation Enhancers:

Four different permeation enhancers namely Sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) (2% w/w), Tween 20(2% w/v), Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (2% w/v) and Poly ethylene glycol -400(PEG400) (2% w/v) were incorporated into the (NaCMC + PEG 6000) gels.  The composition of these gels was given in Table 2.

 

Evaluation of Drug Reservoir   Gels:

Drug Diffusion Study:

Drug diffusion study was conducted using Franz diffusion cell7.  The receptor compartment was filled with 15 ml of phosphate buffer having pH 7.4 as diffusion media. Polymeric film was mounted on the donor compartment with the help of an adhesive. The Proponolol Hydrochloride gel (1 gm containing 25 mg of PHCL) was placed into the donor compartment. Magnetic stirrer was set at 50 rpm and whole assembly was maintained at 32 + 0.5 0C. The amount of drug released was determined by withdrawing 1 ml of sample at regular time intervals for 3 hours. The volume withdrawn was replaced with equal volume of fresh buffer solution. Samples were analyzed for drug content using a UV-spectrophotometer at 290 nm.

 

Permeability Coefficient:

From the drug diffusion data the permeability co efficient for various films was calculated using the equation8 .Pm = (Kapp. H)/A, Where, Kapp is Diffusion rate constant (mg/h) calculated from the slope of the linear drug (d/p) diffusion profiles , H is thickness of the film (cm), A is surface area of the film (cm2).

 


Table 3: Diffusion Characteristics of Propranolol Hydrochloride from Various Transdermal Gels through Cellulose Acetate Films



Formulation

Correlation coefficient(r)

Values

Diffusion Rate

Constant (k)value

(mg/h)

Diffusion

Exponent

Value (n)

Permeability Coefficient

(pmx103 mg /cm.h)

T90 (h)

ZeroOrder

PeppasModel

G1   ( NaCMC)

0.9998

0.9996

0.865

0.9976

0.905

25.99

G2     (Carbopol)

0.9999

0.9999

0.772

1.0076

0.808

29.14

G(MC)

0.9999

0.9999

0.691

1.0069

0.723

32.54

G4   (HPMC)

0.9999

0.9999

0.633

1.0090

0.662

35.51

G5(NaCMC +PVP)

0.9999

0.9998

1.072

0.9910

1.12

20.98

G6(NaCMC+

PEG 6000)

0.9996

0.9997

1.208

0.9913

1.26

18.61

G6A*(NaCMC+

PEG 6000)

0.9999

0.9998

0.716

0.9924

0.749

31.40

 

*Permeability study through mice abdominal skin.

 


Table 4: Diffusion Characteristics Of Propranolol Hydrochloride From Transdermal Gels Containing Various Permeation Enhancers

Formulation

Correlation coefficient (r) values

Zero order rate constant (k) value

(mg/h)

Diffusion exponent value

(n)

Permeability

Coefficient

(pmx103 mg/cm.h)

T90

(h)

 

ZeroOrder

PeppasModel

GP1  (   Tween20)                                   

0.9999

0.9998

1.065

0.9903

1.11

20.64

GP2     ( SLS)                                       

0.9999

0.9990

0.951

0.9930

0.995

23.64

GP3       (DMSO)                        

0.9999

0.9998

0.916

0.9932

0.958

24.55

GP4  ( PEG 4OO)                         

0.9998

0.9979

0.824

1.0110

0.862

27.29

 


Figure1:  Diffusion Profiles Of Propranolol Hydrochloride From Transdermal Gels

 

(-♦-)G1 (Transdermal gel prepared with NaCMC)

 (-■-)G 2 (Transdermal gel prepared with Carbopo

 (-+-)G 3 (Transdermal gel prepared with Methyl cellulose)

 (-▲-)G 4 (Transdermal gel prepared with HPMC)                             

 (-* -) G 5 (Transdermal gel prepared with NaCMC+PVP )

 (-Ĺ-)G 6 (Transdermal gel prepared with NaCMC+PEG 6000)

 (-×-)G 6A* (Transdermal gel prepared with NaCMC+PEG   

         6000 through mice abdominal skin

 

The rate and the mechanism of release of propranolol hydrochloride through the prepared gels were analyzed by fitting the diffusion  data into9, zero-order equation, Q=Q0 –k0t, where Q is the amount of drug released at time t, and k0 is the release rate. First order equation, Ln Q=Ln Q0 – k1t, where k1 is the release rate constant and Higuchi’s equation, Q= k2t1/2, where Q is the amount of the drug released at time t and k2 is the diffusion rate constant. The diffusion data was further analyzed to define the mechanism of release by applying the diffusion data following the empirical equation , M1/Ma=Ktn, where Mt/Ma is the fraction of drug released at time t, K is a constant and n characterizes the mechanism of drug release from the formulations during diffusion process.

 

In vitro skin permeation studies:

 Male wistar rats weighing between 130-160g  and free from any visible sign of  disease were selected for the in vitro studies.the hair on abdominal region was removed using a depilatory preparation  one day prior to experiment.On the day of experiment ,animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation  and abdominal skin was excised.The fatty material adhere to the dermis was carefully peeled off. Freshely excised rat skin of thickness (2mm) was mounted on the donor comportment.10 Formulation G6  and Formulations GP1, GP2, GPand GP4 were evaluated by studying drug diffusion through cellulose acetate membrane and mouse skin. 

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

In the present study efforts were made to prepare transdermal gels of Propranolol Hydrochloride using polymers like HPMC, NaCMC, M.C and Carbopol. To enhance the permeability of Propranolol Hcl, various hydrophilic polymers namely PEG6000, PVP were incorporated in 1:1 ratio (NaCMC: polymer) in to the NaCMC gels. The results of the in-vitro diffusion study from different gels across the

Cellulose acetate films prepared with Ethylacetate -methanol (8:2) are showed in Figure 1.     

 

The gel formulations can be graded in the following order with respect to the rates of release of Propranolol Hydrochloride from them: (HPMC) < (MC) < (Carbopol) <(NaCMC) < (NaCMC +PVP)< (NaCMC+ PEG 6000). Formulation G6 (NaCMC and PEG 6000) has showed good release pattern when compared to other gel formulations which perhaps may be explained by the fact that PEG 6000 enhances solubility of the drug in aqueous vehicle.

 

Figure 2:  Diffusion Profiles of Propranolol Hydrochloride From Transdermal Gels Containing Different Permeation Enhancers

 

(-♦-) GP1 (Transdermal gel prepared with Tween 20)       (-■-)  GP 2 (Transdermal gel prepared with SLS)

(-▲-) GP 3 (Transdermal gel prepared with DMSO)

(-×-)  GP 4 (Transdermal gel prepared with PEG 400)

 

The correlation coefficient values (r) revealed that the diffusion profile follows zero order kinetics and the mechanism of drug release was governed by peppas model. The diffusion exponent of release profiles (slope) has a value of 0.9910-1.0090 (n>1), which indicates case II transport diffusion.11   Permeability coefficient values (Pm) of the films towards the propranolol hydrochloride gel was calculated from the drug diffusion data and the results were given in Table 3.

 

Based on permeability coefficient values Formulation G6 (NaCMC and PEG 6000) was selected for In-vitro skin permeation study . The skin permeation showed a similar pattern as that of the diffusion profile through rate controlling membrane, but the amount of drug permeated through the skin was not satisfactory. Therefore, various permeation enhancers, namely, SLS,( 2% w/w) , PEG400(2% w/v), DMSO(2% w/v) and Tween 20(2% w/v) were incorporated into gels with a view to improve permeability of propranolol hydrochloride.

 

The results of the in-vitro diffusion study from different gels containing various permeation enhancers across the Cellulose acetate films and mice skin are shown in Figure 2. The correlation coefficient values (r) revealed that the diffusion profiles follows zero order kinetics and the mechanism of drug release was governed by peppas model. The diffusion exponent of release profiles (slope) has a value of 0.9903-1.0110 (n>1), which indicates case II transport diffusion.   Permeability coefficient values (Pm) of the films towards the Propranolol Hydrochloride gel was calculated from the drug diffusion data and the results were given in Table 4.

CONCLUSION:

The permeation enhancers like SLS,PEG 400,DMSO and Tween 20 used for increasing  the permeation of drug could be arranged  in the following increasing order according to their permeation rates : Tween 20> SLS> DMSO > PEG 400. The increased permeation rate in all these enhancers may be due to surfactant action .These results indicated that the non ionic surfactant Tween 20 improves the permeability characteristics of Propranolol Hydrochloride when compared with the other permeation enhancers. Formulation - GP1 ((NaCMC +PEG 6000+ Tween 20)) shown required release rate in comparison with other formulations and  was selected as suitable candidate to be delivered through transdermal route at controlled rate.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Colangela PM, Boulin RA, Steinmetz JE and Wedlund PJ. Age and propranolol stereo selective disposition in humans. Clin. Pharmacol .Ther.1992; 51:489-494.

2.      Chein YW. Transdermal controlled systemic medication. 1st  ed. Marcel Decker, New Work, 1976. 

3.      Chowdary KPR and. Naidu RAS.  Preparation and evaluation of cellulose acetate films as rate controlling membranes for transdermal use. Indian Drugs. 1992; 29:312-315.

4.      Gopala Krishna Murthy TE  and Sai Kishore V. Effect of casting solvent and polymer on permeability of propranolol hydrochloride through membrane controlled transdermal drug delivery system. Int. J. Pharma. Exci. 2006; 5(3):68-71.

5.      Panigrahi L and Goshal SK. Effect of permeation enhancers on the release and permeation kinetics of lincomycin hydrochloride gel formulations through mouse skin. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2006; 68(2):205-211.

6.      Robinson JR and Eriksen SP. Theoretical formulation of sustained-release dosage forms. J Pharm. Sci. 1966; 55: 1254-1258.

7.      Franz TJ. Percutaneous Absorption : On Relevance Of In-vitro Data. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1975; 64:190-194.

8.      Fites AL, Banker GS and Smolen VF. Controlled Release Through Polymeric Films. J. Pharm. Sci. 1970;59: 610-614.

9.      Salomon CJ, Bravo SA and Lamas MA. In-vitro studies of diclofenac sodium controlled-release from biopolymeric hydrophilic matrices. J Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2002; 5(3): 213-219.

10.    Rao PR and Diwan PV. Influence of casting solvent on permeability of Ethyl cellulose films for transdermal use. Eastern Pharmacist. 1997; 46:135-139.

11.    Donald L Wise. Hand book of pharmaceutical controlled release technology, Marcel Dekker, Cambridge, 2005 .

 

 

 

Received on 11.09.2008           Modified on 15.11.2008

Accepted on 12.01.2009          © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2(1): Jan.-Mar. 2009; Page  106-109